Talk:Doom community meltdown

Deletion
Article is uncited, relies on references to non-notable persons and events, and seemingly only exists to attempt to further the minor "controversies" it is about. Also stops only just short of endorsing the idea that Doom Eternal needed to be as difficult as possible rather than meaningfully balanced by suggesting that TAG2 was id Software's response to certain online complaints rather than their genuine artistic intent. Delete. --Quasar (talk) 11:57, 9 February 2023 (CST)


 * Delete. Minor storm in a tea cup, if that. --Xymph (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2023 (CST)


 * Delete. Pointless article. --Dynamo128 (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2023 (CST)


 * Delete. A neologism coined by one Youtuber doesn't qualify for an article. Gauss (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2023 (CST)


 * Delete. If this was deserving of an article, then there are dozens of other pointless "controversies" that would need one, like "The Great Team TNT Sell Out" or "The Mars Duct Tape Scandal". Or, keeping with Doom Eternal, the outcry against DRM that successfully caused id to revert course would seem more interesting than youtubers whining about the game being too hard or not hard enough or whatever the supposed fuss was about. --Gez (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2023 (CST)
 * Delete. There is literally nothing here that qualifies this as a good article. Whilst we have shorter articles in dire need of addressing, this controversy isn't exactly known. As far as i am aware, any controversy needs to be significant - Meaning it was reported widely in the news. Heck, one of the most liked comments on that video says: It's kinda nice that this is gonna be considered the "darkest moment" since it's pretty tame compared to a lot of other shitshows that have come out of modern gaming companies recently.. I think that says enough. Delete. --Redneckerz (talk) 13:37, 9 February 2023 (CST)